President's Forum P4 Plan Interviews Biography
PRESIDENT'S FORUM
Re: Ban of Glue
29 Jan 2009
Dear Mister Shahara,
 
with great pleasure I realized your appearance on tt-news. I read all your answers carefully and in my opinion it is a fantastic example how functionaries like you should stay in contact with the base and be in touch with all types of players and the whole table tennis-family. It is also extraordinary that you give table tennis players the possibility to email you.
 
Before posing my questions I want to give you a short introduction of who I am.
 
I play at the moment for Montpellier Tennis de Table in the Pro B League of France. After six years in the second Bundesliga in Germany in different clubs I chose to play and study in a different country.
For me it was a great opportunity get to know to a new playing system, new opponents and to a new language as well. Nevertheless I am still in touch with a lot of Germany players and friends of all level.
For the last three month I have been thinking a lot about the new rules concerning the ban of glue. I am still discussing almost every day with numerous players about the change that is taking place since the introduction at the beginning of September.
When Boosters came on the market it posed two problems. First is that it is against the rule to "add" anything to the racket composition other than what is listed in Rule 2.4 "The RackeT" of the ITTF LAws of TT. Second, we also have a rule 2.4.7, which does not allow the racket covering to be changed in any way on purpose after it has been approved by the ITTF. Rule 2.4 is very old and never changed. Rule 2.4.7 was introduced in 2006 and so is newer. But in any case the Boosters and the Tuners are against these 2 rules. In addition, the ITTF in early 2008 analyzed in 2 laboratories 5 Boosters and Tuners on the market. We found that 4 of them contained VOCs and ALL of them contained poison. Two of them contained high levels of poison that if ingested by a child could be extremely dangerous. We informed the manufacturers and some of them stopped the production immediately. Then appeared the so-called "bio-Boosters" that claim that they are not harmful to health and do not contain any VOC or poison. These are still not legal according to our rules, but maybe in the future, if we change our rules, then these could be allowed if we have a clear way to ensure that they are VOC free and poison free.


Then I read one of your articles about your vision of table tennis..I do not agree with you that to slowing up the game should be the main goal for the future. You have also  argued that it is a possibility to approach the Chinese top players. In my eyes it is quite the contrary at the moment. I think we should be proud of the characteristics of table tennis such as speed and  tempo. That’s it what makes table tennis interesting. And the Chinese will always be the strongest nation, it is not for nothing “their” sport. But I agree that it is something one can have a different opinion.

 

The question of aster or slower is a completely different matter and is of course a matter of opinion. One thing for sure is that I do not encourage our game to be even faster than now as we have already a lot of problems to sell our sport to TV for that reason. But also we do not do anything to make the game slower on purpose. The game will evolve according to the players and coaches and according to trends. The ITTF does not control that. As for the Chinese, or any dominant force in sport, of course the others have to challenge and find ways to beat them. The most sad spectacle I ever saw in sport was the german Team celebrating winning the semifinal match to get to the final of the Olympic Games. They celebrated this win as if they won the Olympic Games, then their match with China was flat and lost in advance. This is not good sport. If you enter an event you try to win  till the ned and you must believe you can win and you fight for your life to win. This is how upsets are created and this is how the top is challenged, never to accept defeat in advance. China was very dominant as well in the early 1980s winning all events. But then Sweden found a way to defeat them for several years. All is possible. This is sport.

 

For me the ban of booster/tuner is not correct for other reasons as well. There is definitely no way to test booster right now. The result is that in my opinion 80-90% of the top player booster.  For the players like me, who are honest and play without any racket-doping there are only disadvantages. I am a student and do not only focus on table tennis. But if a talk to professional players who make a living playing table tennis you always listen to the same arguments. If you do not booster, you play with such a strong handicap that you have to fear to lose your level and therefore salary and premiums.

 

Yes, this is the typical argument. Unfortunately in our sport, and most sports, winning is more important than ethics. You see it all the time. In Football if the Referee is not watching anything can happen, then the players plead innocence. In Athletics, Cycling and Weightlifting it seems that all athletes take drugs. To say that because we can not test for the rule it means we cancel the rule is ridiculous. Can all parents watch their kids 24 hrs per day to see if they are taking drugs. No, of course. Does that means we make drugs legal? In sport, your point is correct, some athletes will benefit and those that follow the rule will be hurt. I agree with you. It means that the majority of the athletes are NOT ethical. This is more an educational problem than a rules problem. As a governing body of the sport we must enforce our rules, we try to check the best we can, and we hope that the players follow the honour system. We know that 90% do not follow the honour system. So we must educate, we must teach that cheating is wrong and we must also improve our testing methods and at the same time we must consider if "so called" safe "additives" should be allowed. We are in a transition period and we must wait and see how things develop.

Thus my second questions: Which advice would you give a professional player in the current situation? Should he play clean and accept the heavy disadvantages?

 

Yes, of course, they should follow the rule. But I know that they are at a great disadvantage and I know they prefer to use non-detectable boosters. Inside the ITTF we say "one step at a time". We believe we eliminated VOCs from the glues. This is a huge success and we achieved our goal. Now new problems and ways to break the rules have emerged., The second step is to find the right way under these new circumstances. This is what we are doing now. Players should just be patient and all will be clear soon.


It is a pity that there is not one single top player who speaks out his position in public. I mean they all know the players who cheat.

 

This is normal. In Athletics they all know who uses drugs, but they do not point the finger. In our sport all the top players have found a solution for themselves, some use Haifu Oil, some use very low VOC boosters (not detectable) and some have found good solutions with new rubbers from the factory made special for them. So, why point the finger? 

To this day I can’t see  any improvement in the control methods. Where are the new boxes which find out every treatment of the racket?


It is taking longer than expected because every day we discover something new. As I said, this is a transition period and we must be patient.



 

Coming to an end I have two last questions. What do you think about the new trend that the companies “prepare” the rackets of their top players in the factories? Is this also forbidden? For me It is exactly the same delict as if an amateur player booster his rubbers. Is there a possibility to force the companies to stop this behavior in the future?

 

It depends how it is done. If the sponge is boosted at the factory level when it is being produced. Then after production iit is aired and free of VOCs, then it is OK. No problem according to our rules. However, if the booster is ADDED after production and after approval by ITTF, then it is also illegal. We have both cases of course. For the players they feel better because they can say that they themselves did not do anything wrong.  We are talking to the manufacturers and trying to work together to control the situation.

 

And at last I would like to know your opinion about the situation in China. I have talked to Chinese players who participated in the Chinese National Championships some weeks ago. It seems not even  to be a subject, the ban of speed glue. The two biggest companies have developed new glue methods. So the result of my respondent was that every(!) player had prepared his racket. And if a follow the Pro Tour Tournaments like the Danish Open today it is pretty clear for me that the sound of the rackets is not normal.

 

The Chinese use VOC-free glue. But they also use the Haifu Oil which expands the sponge and stretches the rubber and gives the speed-glue effect. They claim that it is VOC free and poison-free. We are now analyzing it to see if it's true. If in fact we could have a very safe product that gives the speed-glue effect, then why now. This is just my opinion. However, at the moment even Haifu Oil is breaking our rules 2.4 and 2.4.7, but we can not detect it with our current equipment. However, we have become very strict with the 4mm thickness rule because this is an effect of the oils and boosters is that they expand the sponge.

I want to say sorry for my English and for the length of this email. I am really engaged in the theme. Thank you very much for giving the opportunity to contact you!

 

Your English is fine, it was my pleasure to answer your questions and please feel free to circulate your questions and answers to anyone you want. The more people have these answers the better (if they agree or not is OK) .

 

 

Best regards!

 

Lennart Wehking

 

Archive
Date Subject
29 Jan 2009 Re: Ban of Glue  
4/17/08 Olympic Qualification Background  
12 Nov 2007 How to Honour our Champions  
30 May 2007 Future of World Championships  
27 Jan 2007 New Look for ITTF web site  
29 Dec 2006 Year-end Message  
02 Oct 2006 Frictionless Long Pimples  
28 Sep 2006 Coefficient of friction rule may affect treated pimpled rubber  
25 Sep 2006 Helping defensive players  
9 Sep 2006 The issue of long-pimpled rubbers  
Apr 24 2006 Ofiicial Opening of the 2006 Liebherr World Team Table Table Championships  
Sep 19 2005 BRAVO China  
Sep 8 2005 New Chinese section to ITTF web-site  
Aug 3 2005 Thank you to the table tennis fans  
July 21 2005 Condolences  
Jan 10 2005 Kenya offers its share to other affected countries  
Dec 29 2004 Sri Lanka TTA fighting to recover after tsunami  
Dec 21 2004 The Glue issue resurfaces (see response below)  
Jun 27 2004 Glue  
Mar 29 2004 More about Kong  
Mar 18 2004 Kong Linghui  
Feb 8 2004 Re: Service Rule  
Feb 5 2004 President responds to Xiao Xiao  
Dec 8 2003 Is the 21-points game still alive?  
Aug 26 2003 Malawi is active  
Aug 5 2003 Applying the Service Rule  
Jul 31 2003 Forehand Service  
Jun 23 2003 Re: 11 Up  
Jun 19 2003 Re: Long pips again  
Jun 10 2003 Re: a suggestion  
Jun 5 2003 Re: just some tips from a Chinese  
May 31 2003 Re: game point system and ball quality complaint  
Apr 23 2003 To change or not to change?  
Apr 19 2003 11 points or 21 points?  
Mar 20 2003 President's Report to the 2003 Annual General Meeting  
Feb 04 2003 Egypt Junior Open a Success  
Dec 30 2002 A view to ban Long Pimples  
Dec 29 2002 Advice from Dr. Harrison, member of the President's Advisory Committee  
Dec 21 2002 Year-end Update  
Oct 30 2002 Umpire's concern  
Oct 18 2002 Re: :-) 5 Questions (Damien Lacroix)  
Oct 16 2002 President responds to Mr. HArtmann about Umpires  
Sep 23 2002 Re: Service Rule  
Jul 17 2002 Bi-colored table tennis ball  
May 26 2002 Youth gathers in Tiszaujvaros  
May 13 2002 The President replies to Butterfly regarding the Service Rule  
May 02 2002 The 11 point choice  
Mar 27 2002 Re: I would like to share this joy with you!  
Mar 27 2002 ITTF President answers to Mr. James Ritz.  
Mar 23 2002 ITTF President answers to Mr. James Ritz.  
Feb 02 2002 Congratulations to Matsushita  
Jan 02 2002 ITTF President answers to Mr. Corbin  
Dec 06 2001 ITTF President answers to Bob Base  
Nov 15 2001 About the new counting system  
Nov 14 2001 ITTF President answers to Kazuhiro Toyama  
Nov 13 2001 ITTF President answers to Ting  
Oct 22 2001 2003 World Table Tennis Championships bids  
Oct 17 2001 ITTF President answers to Freeman Newton of USA  
Oct 04 2001 From the President's Diary  
Sep 08 2001 ITTF President answers to Raimund Lenges  
Jun 09 2001 ITTF President answers to Peter Sim  
Sep 01 2001 ITTF PRESIDENT ANSWERS LIONEL HUR OF AUSTRALIA  
Aug 21 2001 Do the clubs, local and regional associations have to follow the ITTF rules ?